The Progs of War

There’s something missing in the Vermont Progressive Party’s platform. In fact, it’s also missing from the platform of Progressive Party gubernatorial candidate Anthony Pollina. And it’s no small matter – it’s the Iraq War.

Go and look for yourselves. I did, and I didn’t find one word about the Iraq War or its many associated ills even mentioned in either platform. Moreover, I did a word search in the Progressive Party’s 27-page platform and absolutely nothing turned up when I searched for “war,” “Iraq,” “peace,” “national guard,” or “soldiers.” Nothing. Zero. Not even a mention.

To be fair, I also did a similar search of the Vermont Democratic Party’s platform. And, frankly, I was pleasantly surprised to find a whole host of references to those very same search words. The word “peace,” in fact, was in the platform’s very first paragraph. But the Vermont Democratic Party didn’t just drop the peace words, they made sense with them. For example, consider this paragraph that appears under the headline, “The War in Iraq:”

a. We condemn the false claims that justify the war in Iraq, and the failure of current foreign policy to consider the historical, cultural and religious forces in the region.

b. We are committed to a sensible and clear strategy to bring those who still serve home from Iraq quickly and with dignity.

c. We are committed to an active policy to cooperate with other nations to support a financial and political commitment to stabilizing and securing Iraq.

d. All military personnel, veterans and their families must be recognized for their courage and service and are entitled to full medical, emotional and financial support.

See? That’s not real hard, is it? Or controversial, for that matter, since nearly 80% of Vermonters want an end to the Iraq War.

Why, then, would Vermont’s Progressive Party and its perennial candidate of choice, Anthony Pollina, refuse to even acknowledge the war in their platforms? In a word: Politics. Or, if you’d prefer a few more words: A failure to lead.

Back in late-2001 when this nation was in its bloodthirsty post-9/11 rage, the nascent Progressive Party set the stage for ignoring the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq by resorting to parliamentary maneuvers to squelch efforts by party activists to pass a resolution condemning the deafening drumbeats of war at the time. At its November 2001 state party convention, a resolution condemning the war talk was first passed by those in attendance. But then Progressive Party leaders, led by then-Representative Carina Driscoll, quickly maneuvered to “table” the resolution and – with breakneck speed – succeeded in killing it.

I remember it well. Because I was there. And I remember the confusion amongst those in attendance when one moment we thought the Progs were about to do the right thing by opposing the Bush war machine and then the next minute being undercut by underhanded maneuvers that effectively ended the debate.

At the time, I was a columnist for Seven Days so I approached Anthony Pollina and asked him about why the party leaders killed the anti-war resolution.

“We want the party to focus on statewide issues,” Pollina told me at the time. “9/11 and the response to it isn’t a Vermont issue.”

It was a mantra that the leaders had apparently agreed upon because they all repeated the same line as I made my way from one leader to another – from Driscoll to Ellen David-Friedman to Chris Pearson. They were in lockstep: The Progressive Party would not lead on the war issue – nor would they even mention it.

After the Party’s convention, Pearson sent out an email update to the Party faithful, declaring that there was “relief” amongst many that the Progs didn’t take a stand on the upcoming wars. The apparent “relief” they were feeling was about not wanting to “marginalize” itself from the voting population before Pollina was about to launch a run for lieutenant governor.

And so the war silence began for the Progs. Worse, that silence continues to this day.

To date, six Vermonters have returned from the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq in body bags. But the Progressive Party apparently still doesn’t believe it’s a “Vermont issue.” Moreover, according to the Policy Priorities Project, Vermont tax-payers have coughed up more than $680 million to fund the Iraq war, while Vermont’s Progressive Party or favorite son, Pollina, won’t even mention the war in their platforms. They’d apparently rather express “relief” in ignoring it.

Unfortunately, ignoring the war is a privilege many of us can’t share with the Progressive Party’s leadership. The six Vermonters who lost their lives can’t ignore it. Their families can’t ignore it. Those of us with an understandable sense of outrage over the Bush administration’s lies and deceit while marching us to war can’t ignore it. And those of who can think of much better ways to spend the $680 million can’t ignore it, either. Indeed, nearly 80% of Vermonters don’t want to ignore the issue of the War on Iraq – they want it ended, and ended now.

The Progressive Party’s “duck and cover” approach to the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq is in direct contrast to the rich history of bold leadership that has been found in alternative parties in this country. Its silence on the number one issue of the day should tell us a lot about the current leadership of the Progressive Party and its apparent “relief” in not leading.

Vermont’s Progressive Party should be ashamed of the deaf ear it’s turned toward the most pressing issue of our time. Because there’s nothing “progressive” about avoidance.

This is what dissent looks like:

First Campaign Ad

Okay, I’m new at this electioneering thing. But I’m studying it. And the first thing I’m learning is that people don’t want to be challenged. They want their politicians to pat them on the head and say, “I hear you. And I agree with you.” But this strategy really works if it’s then followed up with some kind of silly distraction. So, let me say this: “I hear you. And I agree with you.” Now, quick, watch this:

Citizenship Malpractice

I hereby charge my friends, neighbors and fellow countrymen and women with citizenship malpractice. Oh yeah, and I’m charging myself, too. Because we’re all being pathetic. War, injustice, corporate crimes, eco-genocide and economic thievery surround us with the regularity of the air we breathe. And yet we continue to yawn.

“Oh please, can’t someone else deal with this?” we seemingly opine in our silent slumber. “Can’t we blame the other guy? The other party? The other nation or state? The other neighbor? Your spouse? Anyone, goddamn it. Just not me!”

But the stink of it all remains at our feet. Dick Cheney spews his venom toward our majority with a big, fatuous “so?” and we squeak like little mice in the corner. We run to our blogs and our friends and our neighbors and we say all the same thing: “Did you hear what Cheney said?”

Repeat it a million times: Dick Cheney said “so?” to a question about why the Iraq war continues despite the fact that 75% of the nation wants it stopped now. Let’s see who can repeat it the best. Let’s see who can express the most authentic-sounding shock and awe. Let’s all read it at every blog and listen to every pundit explain it over and over and over again.

Got it, people? Dick Cheney said “so?” to you and your opinions. And all we can muster in response is a cacophony of whines that merely report on his latest utterance of arrogance. “Hey, no fair! The Vice President doesn’t care!”

And why should he? What’s he got to be scared of? The little blogging mice? The platitude-filled pundits who keep steering us all toward the 18 millionth contortion on the “Hillary and Obama scenarios”? Or the people – we, the citizens – who just keep yawning in the face of each and every new slap to our faces?

At least Dick Cheney’s being honest. Moreover, he’s almost daring the citizens of this nation to wake up and challenge him  — and them. Cheney’s saying “so?” to the cameras to look polite. Off camera, it’s more like: Stop me if you can.

And, so far, we can’t. Because we’re not taking our own citizenship seriously. We’re abdicating an enormous amount of our power to the “powers that be.” Worse, instead of effective activist responses, we satisfy ourselves with ineffective repetitions of the crimes being committed against us. Talking about the injustices and outright crimes being perpetuated by our political leaders has replaced DOING something about it.

Imagine, if you will, if you went to a doctor and she said: “Yep, it’s cancer.” And then she left the room. Better yet, she got on the public address system in the office and announced: “This patient has cancer.” And everyone on staff and everyone in the waiting room just nodded about the horrors of it, called some folks they knew to repeat the horrors, emailed their list-serve about it, and then just carried on with their day and their lives.

We’d call that medical malpractice. Because in medicine, we don’t just expect a diagnosis, we also expect one hell of a good faith effort at treatment or, if you will, an activist remedy.

Oh, if modern-day citizenship only carried the same kind of expectations. You know, a simple kind of expectation that would follow the medical lineage between diagnosis and cure. And if we, the citizens, simply acknowledged the problems without effectively addressing them, we’d be accused of citizenship malpractice – a most serious dereliction of duty that has betrayed our ideals, our future, our health, our safety and the very foundation of our democracy that requires citizen leadership.

Consider ourselves charged – on several counts – of citizenship malpractice.

And our sentence? Stop the war and stop the injustice. Now – not after the next primary, the next vote, the next candidate, the next rally, the next month, the next promise, but now.

Get to work, America. And clear your record.

Pollina’s Milk Company Tanking

It wasn’t hard to see this coming, not with the track record of Anthony Pollina being what it is: losing, losing and losing. But the Caledonia Record reported earlier this week that the milk company co-founded by Progressive Party stalwart Anthony Pollina, the Vermont Milk Company, is experiencing some serious financial setbacks. Worse, one of the five farms that supplied the non-organic milk to the company is crying foul when it comes to the payments they received from Pollina’s company.

Last week, before news of the company’s troubles became public, Pollina tendered his resignation from the company’s board in order to “focus on his run for governor.” While the Pollina campaign is seeking to distance itself from the company’s new woes, it continues to highlight the Vermont Milk Company as a major achievement in his efforts to help Vermont’s dairy farmers.

According to the first paragraph of Pollina’s biography on his campaign website, “he was approached by a group of dairy farmers interested in working together to keep farming viable. The result was the Vermont Milk Company – a farmer controlled ice cream, cheese and yogurt plant. Anthony ran the start up until 2008.”

But Karla Barrett and Mark Sutton, two Northeast Kingdom farmers who sent their milk to Pollina’s start-up, aren’t impressed with the “help” they received.

The following is an excerpt from the Caledonian record story:

“We stopped shipping milk to them December 1 because we didn’t get paid,” Karla Barrett said. “They still owe us a lot of money. We got paid the base price but not the extra money.”

She said she understood there had been some poor business management decisions, but she wants to know what is going on.

“Somehow I think they should look into Anthony Pollina. I don’t think he’d make a good governor if he can’t run a little milk company,” Barrett said. “Hopefully, investors will come through and they can clear all this up.”

Interestingly, officials at the Vermont Milk Company are claiming that its financial problems are a result of the “high milk prices” being paid to farmers of late. Pollina, therefore, was in a most awkward position in his dual role as dairy farmer advocate and dairy company executive. And, according to Barrett, the farmers came out on the losing end of that particular juggling act of Pollina’s.

News of the Hardwick-based Vermont Milk Company’s financial failures come at a sensitive time for Pollina – just as he puts his campaign for governor into high gear while using the company as an “example” of his “professional” experience.

A call to the headquarters of the Vermont Milk Company by Broadsides wasn’t returned today. The person answering the phone only said that no one was available because the company was in the middle of a board meeting. One can only imagine that they had a lot to discuss, not least of which was trying to fix this problem before it brought Pollina down with the farmers he’s always proclaimed to be helping.

The real mystery in this story is where are Vermont’s other mainstream media outlets? So far, not a peep…

Come Dream With Me….

Wow. Thanks for all the feedback on yesterday’s post. And while I understand that most of it came in the form of private emails and calls, I’m going to be counting on you – my fellow dreamers – to come out of the closet and get on this bandwagon soon. This little populist train is revving up and ready to climb some mighty big hills – hills that include a real health care revolution, some sanity to the tax and spend policies at the Statehouse, a new respect for the natural beauty and fountain of possibilities that exist within Vermont’s environment and landscape, and a real and open discussion about supporting Vermont’s soldiers now serving in Iraq by bringing them home NOW.

It’s about dreaming. Moreover, it’s about making the dreams of the people becoming the realities of our elected officials – the way it should be. For far too long, the dreams of the people have been routinely extinguished by the dullards who dominate our government. And they’re not unrealistic dreams, either. The people want some economic security in the form of fair taxation, a sane heath care policy, a dedication to keeping Vermont’s landscapes both working and clean, and a simple comfort in knowing that hard working families will be rewarded, not ignored and/or threatened.

Imagine – or dream, if you will – if our government acted with the same kind of haste and determination for working families that they acted with when it comes to Wall Street corporations. Bear Stearns finds economic trouble and the federal government rushed in with $30 billion to prop its buyout up. But, here in Vermont, the same economic downturn leads Vermont’s super-majority-Democrats to announce that they have to remove health care reform from the table this year. Got that, folks?

Worse, the hierarchy of Vermont’s Progressive Party has forced itself into a self-induced state of silence on these important issues because its perennial candidate, Anthony Pollina, is too busy courting those same Democrats than highlighting the important policy differences between them. The result? We, the people, lose once again.

Sorry, but how many elections – both statewide and nationwide – are we going to be told to just “sit tight” in silence while the “big-wigs” work it all out for us. “Shhh,” they say, don’t rock the boat on the war, on impeachment, on health care, on justice, on stopping torture, on stopping illegal wiretaps, on protecting our resources, on crying foul with corporate bailouts, on the oh-so-tiring double and triple talk of it all. Yes, be silent people, because “they” are working on it.

How’s that silence working out for you?

This is not the time for silence amongst the people in Vermont or all across this nation or this world. It is a time to speak out. To be heard. And to make demands. It’s democracy time, folks, rev up your tongues and your pens and your votes. If anything must be silenced, it is the lullabies of the power elite.

When Peter Shumlin and the Democrats hum the tune of “no health care reform this year” into your ear, resist it and speak out. When Gaye Symington offers her soothing apologies for the complete two-year failure of the super-majority she wields in the Vermont House, demand solutions or her seat. And when Governor Douglas announces – as he did yesterday – that he’s giving money to the Von Trapp’s to fix their barn roof, ask him why they get a new barn roof and we get to turn back the bed sheets at their inn? Enough with the silence. Enough with the lullabies. Because naptime is over. Oh yeah, it’s morning time in Vermont’s democracy.

Let’s speak up. And speak out. Let’s not be afraid to dream. And let’s not be afraid to let the purveyors of the politics-as-usual know that our passions and our ideals will not be extinguished by their games or their deals.

We’re fully capable of keeping score at home. And, frankly, we’re tired of losing.

Indeed, come dream with me.

A Run for Governor?

Hello folks, it’s semi-official. After being approached and encouraged by many people, I am now actively considering a run for governor of Vermont under the banner of the Progressive Party. It has become clear to me and others that a true third-party choice is necessary in this upcoming election.

The only declared candidate for governor in the Progressive or Democratic parties is Anthony Pollina, and he has been seemingly more interested in playing footsie with the powers-that-be than offering a true alternative to them. I, on the other hand, believe in the importance and necessity of building an alternative base to politics as usual amongst the dominant two parties.

I think it’s important for a progressive to be in this race to offer a true contrast to the failings of the other major parties when it comes to stopping the war, providing health care for all, addressing economic inequality and celebrating and protecting Vermont’s natural resources.

You know who I am: an activist, writer, musician, farm-husband and – over the last six-years – a horseman. I believe in Vermont, especially in its deep and powerful independent streak. But I am concerned and disheartened when those claiming to honor that heritage become victims of the urge to dilute their passions in the pursuit of political power – a most distasteful cocktail that says one and only one thing to the voters: Manipulation.

I believe that Vermonters are ready and yearning for a political candidate who speaks truth to power, who will not mince words when it comes to the problems we are facing, who understands the Vermont way of living, who won’t talk about being for change but purr in the face of the same old, same old political forces, and who won’t call themselves an “alternative” but bow at the altar of the power elite.

As a resident of this state for nearly 20 years, I understand its unique nature. I understand its powerful possibilities. I believe in its ability to lead. And I have done nothing but fight for its right – and responsibility — to persevere as a leader for change in a nation drifting toward a rut of complacency and, worse, inequality.

Yes, Vermonters, it’s time for change. But that change must be led by true change agents – not the same old hucksters and political players.

Governor Jim Douglas must be defeated. He has steadfastly supported George Bush at nearly every opportunity – including serving as his Vermont campaign chairman. Moreover, Douglas has happily slept in the Bush White House while Vermonters have suffered from the presidential policies that have led us to perpetual war, to economic catastrophe, to $3.25 gas prices, to support for torture, and to a new and heightened sense of disenfranchisement from our nation’s democratic ideals.

Yes, Douglas must go. That much is obvious – just ask yourself if you’re better off now than when Douglas first took office in 2002? And then ask yourself if Douglas – or the Democrats – have done ANYTHING that has lessened your family’s economic burden or provided your family with true hope for the future?

Vermonters deserve true change. And I’m humbled by this pursuit and look forward to your input.

All the best,

Michael Colby

Hit & Run Blogging: On Dean, Pollina, Spitzer & Biking

Dean Disappears (again): It looks like Vermont’s own Howard Dean is finally getting some heat for his complete inability to handle the Democratic delegate nightmare that is playing out in Florida and Michigan. As the head of the Democratic National Committee, this delegate fiasco has been occurring on Dean’s watch from the beginning when the two states first defied the party’s wishes regarding the timing of their primaries. And now Dean’s DNC is striking out in its attempts to find a happy ending to the mess.

Worse, it sure seems like Dean’s been playing his all-too-familiar duck and cover game with a political hot potato. Where, exactly, has he been during the public discourse on this mess? I’m no casual media watcher and I haven’t seen him at all.

It’s pretty clear that the Dem party power elite don’t think much of Dean anyway. I heard one pundit just scoff at the idea of Dean pulling the Obama and Clinton camps into his office to hammer out a deal, saying, “He just doesn’t have the stature.”

Vermonters, of course, are used to this kind of hiding from Dean. When the Vermont courts forced the legislature to pass the law allowing “civil unions” between gay and lesbian couples, Dean literally hid in his backroom (closet?) when he signed it. It was a most cowardly act and a major finger to the eye of the many people who worked hard on the issue and deserved the kind of public acknowledgment that normally accompanies such an historic occasion. But not with cowardly Howard – he just signed it in the backroom and then, years later, bragged about his involvement with the law on the national stage.

But it’s time for Dean to come out of hiding while the delegate mess continues to zap energy, time and focus from the real issues at hand. He’s got to stop acting like the hiding child while his parents fight in the other room. Dean is the chairman of the Democratic Party. And he needs to start acting like it.

Speaking of Presidential Politics: Let’s see, where are we? Oh yeah, the Clinton people are highlighting the fact that Obama’s minister has the audacity to talk about white elites. The Obama people are calling Clinton a monster. And the McCain people are trying to keep their boss’s mental volcano from erupting before November.

Maybe that’s why Dean is hiding. Now I get it.



Speaking of (Not) Getting It:
The Pollina folks still aren’t getting it. It was nice to see Burlington Free Press reporter Terri Hallenbeck pick up on the Pollina hypocrisy meme that yours truly began here earlier this week. Read it for yourselves:

He called for buying local to boost Vermont’s rural economy. “Let’s start by buying Vermont, not just talking about it like the current governor does. He says buy local, it is just that simple. Yet in our institutions we still find hamburger from Iowa and milk from Massachusetts,” Pollina said.

On each table in the cafeteria were bowls of goldfish crackers and pretzels for the audience. Asked if those were made in Vermont, Pollina said he didn’t know but acknowledged it was unlikely. He said he didn’t plan the details of the event, but that by supporting Vermont business, more locally made products would be available. “You need to create markets,” he said.

Pollina just doesn’t get it. But it’s nice to see the Vermont media begin to examine the silliness of his campaign.

I thought it was interesting that the Vermont Press Bureau didn’t even bother to send a reporter to what must have been Pollina’s third “campaign launch.” Even though they described this one as the “official” launch, the Press Bureau clearly had better things to do (McGillicuddy’s?). The result was that Pollina’s not-so-grand campaign launch didn’t even get a mention in either the Rutland Herald or the Barre/Montpelier Times Argus. Ouch.

Pollina should take it as a hint that he needs to start saying something. And, no, that doesn’t mean more warmed-over talking points he’s pilfered from the Dems. Of course, it would also help if he’d stop with his “do as I say, not as I do” lectures to Vermonters.

Earth to the Pollina campaign: Bananas, oranges, watermelons, goldfish crackers and pretzels are NOT Vermont products.

Obligatory Spitzer Post: The newspaper of record, The New York Times, reported the following on its online edition earlier this week: “Close aides to the governor suggested on Tuesday that the mood in the Spitzer home was tense.”

Ya think?

Please. Can’t we just leave them alone? It absolutely turned my stomach to read the reports that the swarming phalanx of journalists camped out at the Spitzer apartment had to part yesterday morning to allow two of Spitzer’s teenage girls to get out of the building and get to school.

The word parasites comes to mind – as does a number of accompanying adjectives.

We really are a holier-than-thou nation, aren’t we? But for a nation that now logs a greater than 50% divorce rate, it sure seems strange how quickly we like to play the righteous card.

People fail. Couples fail. Marriages fail. So, please, let those who have no failings cast the first stone. And that should clear the parasites away from the Spitzer home in a hurry.

Finally, as we prepare for the biking season in Vermont (finally!), take a gander at this public service announcement from England. It’s in the form of a short, 30-second test. I flunked it. And you? [Hat tip to: TJC].

Thursday Music Blogging (Just Because I Can…)

Pollina Campaign: Do As We Say, Not As We Do

I guess the Pollina campaign will be the gift that keeps giving to this writer-boy. It’s just too bad that the mainstream media here in Vermont won’t wake up to the campaign’s many silly blunders. Yesterday, of course, we highlighted some of the names listed on the “Democrats for Pollina” website as being far from “Democrats.” And today I got a tip from a vegetable farmer here in Vermont who found it comical that Pollina’s little video speech on his campaign website about the importance of “buying Vermont food products” features a backdrop of…ready for this: bananas, oranges and a watermelon. Watch it yourself:

Like I said yesterday, this campaign is not ready for primetime – deep in the recesses of cable access, perhaps. But not primetime.

I mean, wouldn’t you think Pollina or someone on the campaign staff or video crew would stop to consider what food product is behind him when he says these words to Vermonters:

The State must set the example when it comes to buying Vermont products and helping provide markets for our farmers. It is frustrating to know that our prisons, state colleges and other institutions are still buying and serving dairy and other products that could be bought right here at home. We need more instate processing of meats, vegetables and other farm products. We need to make investments in agriculture infrastructure and on farm enterprises. And we need to build a Vermont Fair Trade certified brand of dairy and other Vermont products.

Or am I missing something and did Vermont just become a major grower of bananas, oranges and watermelons? Heh, you never know with global warming…

While campaign video backdrops may seem trivial, it does point to a continued sloppiness in what is increasingly looking like a haphazard and desperate effort. Remember, this is the campaign that began by trying to parse the definition of “intend,” as in: “I intend to run for governor.” He did that, of course, so he could keep his radio show (Equal Time) going while setting up the campaign without having to play by the “equal time” norms of campaigning. Cute.

And this is also the campaign that played semantics with his fundraising efforts. You’ll recall that Pollina announced at one point that his campaign had a goal of raising $100,000 by mid-January. Well, mid-January came and Pollina did what he thought he had to do: announce that the goal had been met. But when some of the Vermont media woke up for a brief second and asked for proof, Pollina had to admit that at least $30,000 of that money was in the form of “pledges.” Sure, Tony, just play loose with the facts and keep pretending you’re above the political games.

And now we come to his “buy Vermont” faux pas. Of course we all support the notion of buying local. Some of us have been doing that long before the trendy “localvore” movement became…well…trendy. But if you’re going to get up on a video soapbox and lash out at your opponent’s lack of follow through about “buying Vermont products first,” wouldn’t it be wise to hide the bananas, oranges and watermelons in the background? Or, better yet, wouldn’t you want to be featuring some good-old-fashioned Vermont products? Just a thought.

Unfortunately, this is the kind of “do as I say, not as I do” norm that many of us have seen from Pollina over the years. He wants to talk about his “closeness” with the “working man” but he’s more often than not seen sitting at the coffee shop during working hours. He wants to talk about the horrors of things like pesticides but starts a non-organic milk company. He talks about the problems of bovine growth hormone (rBGH) but is too scared to join efforts against the Cabot Creamery’s use of it. He talks about the importance of a third party but covets the Democratic Party’s support. He talked about the importance of public financing of campaigns but then ran into some very rich friends. And now he’s telling voters about the importance of buying Vermont produce with bananas as a backdrop.

Frankly, I’m not sure if Pollina’s clueless or just another smarmy politician amongst many. Either way, it amounts to a terrible start to what everyone admits is a huge uphill battle to unseat the incumbent governor, Jim Douglas. I guess he’s satisfied with fooling the same 15% of the population that he always does – and then calling it a “victory.”

Vermont progressives deserve better.

Tuesday Random Blogging

Torture is Us: First of all, I’m wondering if any of those good liberals who condemned the people of Brattleboro for voting to indict Bush & Cheney for crimes against the Constitution are having any second thoughts now that the chimp-in-chief has vetoed the anti-waterboarding legislation? I doubt it. Because it’s becoming more apparent that the two-party monopolizers are too addicted to one another to come up for a fresh breath of logic. They love having Bush in office just so they can spend several years doing little more than complaining about him, raising gobs of money, blogging themselves to exhaustion and then wheeling in a Trojan Horse candidate that they really, truly – well — almost believe is going to do something liberal when elected. But – shhh – don’t make him/her commit to anything now because those big, dumb voters wouldn’t understand strong opinions during the election season. And on and on it goes.

Republicans Aren’t Scared of Impeachment: Oh boy, there’s nothing like a good Democractic sex scandal to get the Republicans going. Never mind the hypocrisy of it all, the Republicans are now wetting themselves with excitement over the gonadal noose New York’s Governor Eliot Spitzer is in. And now it appears they’re going to do what they always do when a Democratic pol puts his penis where he shouldn’t: They’re threatening impeachment. Yep, the Republican leaders of the New York legislature have announced that if Spitzer doesn’t step aside on his own they’re going to file impeachment papers and move forward with a forced withdrawal.

While it’s comforting to know that the Democrats don’t rush toward impeachment on such personal matters, it would be nice if they would move on impeachment when the stakes are higher than a $5,000 an hour good time. You know, something like the president lying to the nation, putting nearly 200,000 soldiers in harms way for no good reason, condoning torture and circumventing the Constitution with more recklessness than Eliot Spitzer could dream of in an hour in room 871.

The Dems should look at it this way: Every time the Republicans move to impeach based on the inappropriate placement of a penis, they should move to impeach based on the inappropriate placement of troops.

Ready, set, go…

Dems for Pollina Update: Well, it looks like the little Democrats for Pollina campaign is being run as shoddy as about every other campaign initiative Pollina has led. A quick look at some of the names on the list certainly makes the whole thing look rather suspect. I noticed, for example, that Grace Gershuny is listed as a “Dem for Pollina.” But Gershuny is also listed as the Groton town chair for the Progressive Party at the party’s website. Oops. And it’s also more than a bit fishy that they list Brian Tokar as a Democrat. Brian, as most of us know, is a self-described “anarchist” and was on the national committee for the Green Party. Oops again.

I did some calling around yesterday and spoke to several of the charter members of the “Democrats for Pollina.” One person on the list who asked that I not identify him/her had this to say:

Dave Zuckerman was going around with a petition. I said I really didn’t think it was appropriate for me to sign, and he gave a bunch of reasons why it was OK. I suspect many of the signers have never been associated in any way w/ the Democrats…

Indeed. While this kind of thing is par for the course in mainstream politics, the purveyors of such nonsense usually aren’t so sloppy. Didn’t they think people would check the names?

This campaign certainly doesn’t feel like it’s ready for primetime. But, then again, which Pollina campaign ever was?

Subprime Link Fun
: Check this out for a fun little explanation of the subprime mess.

Obama Must-Read: If there’s anyone else out there who still thinks it’s important to consider the issues when contemplating the presidential race, go here and read this. It’s an incredible essay by Nader’s running mate, Matt Gonzalez. Please, read it and tell me what you think. I wish the progressive Dems out there would stop ignoring these very significant issue flaws in Obama. I was particularly interested to learn that Obama campaigned for Joe Lieberman in ’06 when he ran against the netroots’ darling, Ned Lamont. How can these things be ignored?

Quote of the Day

There has never been a romantic movement among mathematicians.

Todd Colby