Mark Johnson: The Vermont Power Elite’s Toadie

I’ve been homebound a bit more than I’d like lately. First, with a hideous chest cold and now to avoid the soggy ground and attempt to get some inside work done. And being inside for me usually means being a slave to the radio – talk radio to be precise.

In Central Vermont, local talk radio means WDEV to me. But I’m not sure how much more I can take – especially in the morning – as Mark Johnson of the not-so-cleverly-named “Mark Johnson Show” seems hell-bent in his milquetoast pursuit of playing the media lapdog to Vermont’s power elite.

If you’ve ever listened to Johnson, you’ll know what I’m talking about: He approaches his media role not like a probing reporter but more like a member – if not a leading member – of an insider’s club of Vermont’s media, economic and political elite. In other words, Johnson takes the exact opposite path of what the late, great Joseph Pulitzer saw as the true goal of the “fourth estate’: To have no friends.

For two hours a day, five days a week, Johnson brings forth a steady stream of his fellow club members, exchanging pleasant guffaws with them and lobbing softballs in their general direction, seemingly not bothered by the shallowness of it all. It is, after all, what maintains his membership to the “club.” Because we all know the quickest way to get kicked out of the Vermont media and political elite is to actually ask some tough questions of your fellow members. Bye-bye invites to “Vermont This Week,” for sure. And so long to those 15-minute puff-pieces with Leahy/Sanders/Welch/Douglas where allowing them to regurgitate their talking points masquerades as an “interview.”

If Johnson ever does demonstrate disdain for anyone, it’s usually the poor fool who dares to call into his show and criticize the media. Johnson will not tolerate it. Never mind that the Vermont media is an atrophied shadow of what the media really should be (and getting worse by the week given the layoffs and cutbacks), Johnson will not let even the mildest media critique get by without either a hang-up and/or a stern rebuke.

Most recently, for example, the leader of the Vermont Senate, Peter Shumlin, was a guest on Johnson’s show to discuss the Democratic leadership’s decision to put gay marriage on its priority list for this current session. The all-too-frequent and curmudgeonly old-guy callers (do these guys ever work?) to his show bombarded Shumlin with the Republican talking points, declaring that the gay marriage issue was a “distraction” to the real matters (read: economic) facing the state.

Shumlin hung in there quite admirably, trying – time and time again – to point out that the gay marriage bill wasn’t really taking up much time and, nevertheless, was merely one bill among dozens and dozens that the legislature was more than capable of considering.

But Shumlin crossed the Johnson line when he dared to venture into even the mildest of mild media criticism. “Well,” declared an almost exasperated Shumlin, “we held a press conference yesterday about our latest economic plan but you wouldn’t know it because the media didn’t cover it.”

“Wait, wait, wait,” interjected Johnson, “before you start criticizing the media…”

And Shumlin, being the good club member himself, knew that he had to back down, allowing Johnson’s rebuke to stand while shelving his very reasonable critique of the Vermont media and allowing its embarrassingly shallow coverage of the Statehouse go unchecked.

But Johnson’s at his all-time worst when he’s interviewing a fellow media club member. Take, for example, his interview today with WCAX’s Marselis Parsons. Johnson invited Parsons on after he read the news that Vermont’s own media dinosaur was considering retiring. The ensuing interview was little more than a mutual admiration love-fest: “Don’t you love what you do?”

Um, excuse me fellas, but you’re members of the media. So why don’t you loosen up your lover’s embrace long enough to ask a hard question in these incredibly hard times. You know, something like: How did the Vermont media completely blow it when it comes to the economic crisis? And why don’t we hold some of our life-long political figures accountable for fiddling while our economy burned?

Instead, we got things like: “Wow, you’ve been there for 42 years?” “I’ve only been around for half that time.” “Does it feel like it’s been that long?” “Tell me about your favorite interview?”

That, my friends, is how you remain in the club: lob softballs at your fellow club members, make no waves, and fantasize about all the accolades that might come your way after 42-years of doing little but shilling for the power elite. Oh yeah, Mark, you’re halfway there…

If Johnson ever does show disdain, it’s almost always for those who dare to criticize the media or hold Vermont politicians accountable. Instead of probing the power elite, Johnson acts as a firewall to seemingly protect them – thus assuring more bland interviews with his clubmates. “Tell me, Senator Leahy, how does it feel to be so powerful?” Yawn.

The only disdain Johnson ever shows is almost exclusively for those who dare to put a spotlight on the miserable state of the Vermont media. He simply won’t tolerate it. Much like he won’t tolerate any true people-based attempt to hold his poltical friends accountable for their dithering and/or outright assistance in bringing about the mess we’re currently in as a state and a nation.

Sadly, Johnson’s a proud member of the insider’s club and he’s not going to risk his next attempt to crawl into the laps of fellow members by – gasp! – asking some uncomfortable questions of them. There are rules, you know.

Johnson, of course, is no different than almost all of his fellow Vermont media brethren. They know how to keep buttering their bread, even if it means totally and completely bastardizing the real role of the media: Standing outside of the club so as to ask the tough questions and demand the real answers.

But one thing is for sure: Johnson gets his phone calls returned, especially when those on the other end know that little more than lobs will be coming their way. “Tell me, Senator Sanders, how does it feel to be so popular?”

Or maybe he’s just being honest because, after all, it is called the “Mark Johnson Show.” And it is, indeed, all about Mark Johnson and his cozy friendships with those who are willing to trade back-scratches and belly-rubs. Anything, that is, but make waves….

Sorry, Mr. Pulitzer, it’s a whole different era.

Comments

  1. Kingdom Reader says:

    Nice post, if not a bit obvious. I’ve long thought that Johnson was “mailing it in.” Or at the very least, that he has forgotten how to distinguish between his interviews and his reading of his advertisements. Are there any investigative reporters in Vermont? Seriously, are there?

  2. anon says:

    I’m sure you’re going to get the cold shoulder over this post. I’m also sure that it’s something you’re used to. It is interesting that this kind of media criticism is so rare in Vermont.

    Investigative reporters in Vermont? None that I’m aware of. Instead, we have a handful of press conference/press release chasers who basically follow a very superficial he said/she said formula in their reporting.

  3. Marcus Johnson says:

    Let me apologize for my whitebread cuz.

    Mark has always been king of the softballs. He wants people to like him, not fear him. I get more push back from my 5 year old then Johnson gives to his guests. Kudos for exposing this poor exucse for a journalist.

  4. The only thing these MSM reporters are going to ‘investigate’ is YOU:

    “Michael Colby–Vermont’s Rush?”—Seven Days
    “Colby–The Fifth Horseman.”—BFP
    “We Can’t Investigate Shit–We’re Going Down The Tubes–Fast”—TA
    “Hazardous Sled Rides & Consumer Safety”—VPIRG Newsletter
    “The Man Who Hates Vermont”—WCAX
    “Analysis–Do Vermont Bloggers Have Too Much Freedom–Should Laws Be Passed?”—Vermont This Week
    “The bin Laden Of La-La Land”—Ch44 Fox Vt.
    “Some Of My Best Friends Are Mark Johnson’s Too”—certain call-in WGDR show
    “Michael Colby and Stalin–Socialism Just Not Good Enough”—Vermont Peace & Justice Newsletter
    “Next He’ll Attack Champ”—VPR

    Ah yes. Good ole investigative reporting. Hope it doesn’t get in the way of the high school sports.

  5. Ivan Jacobs says:

    I tend to agree, but when exactly did this about-face happen? Was there a tipping point?

    http://vermontsnarkyboy.blogspot.com/2006/08/wdevs-mark-johnson-best-of-vermonts.html

  6. M. Colby says:

    Hey Ivan,

    I’ve got a couple different ways to respond. 1) Snarky Boy was a fictitious character swimming in my not-so-fertile imagination. A painter, remember? Or 2) I’m letting my schizophrenia show again.

    I guess it’s your choice. Or maybe it’s a combination of the two. Oh no, I thought I was done with therapy…

    But seriously, there aren’t a lot of choices for local talk radio around Central Vermont. And I think it’s obvious that I do, indeed, listen to MJ quite regularly. But his political coverage is infuriating to me for the reasons outlined in this piece — it’s too damn clubby.

    Thanks for playing. Or, as Snarky Boy would say, go fuck yourself.

  7. Well…let’s pause a moment in silence for all the ‘dead’ reporters, past and present………………………………………OK, that’s enough. I do really wish we could all somehow network this blogging into a weekly ‘print’ paper. If it were done right, we could all have fun, put the assholes on the spot (where they belong) and maybe, with some creative spin, become fashionable like Seven Days (I’ll do the mystic stuff), and then we can franchise out the fucker and become rich pigs
    after we sell out to FOX. “I think it would be fun to run a newspaper.”

Speak Your Mind

*

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word